RTP Mobile Logo

Striving for Consensus: The Application of Existing and Emerging Research Findings to the Practical Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers

Striving for Consensus: The Application of Existing and Emerging Research Findings to the Practical Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers

GICUTT114/Video

TARGET AUDIENCE
This activity has been designed to meet the educational needs of medical oncologists, including gastroenterologists, interventional radiologists and hepatologists, hematologists, hematology-oncology fellows and other healthcare providers involved in the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer.

Clone of RTP TV 2012 - HER2+ Breast Cancer

SABCS14

SURVEY PARTICIPANTS
Kathy S Albain, MD
Kimberly L Blackwell, MD
Howard A Burris III, MD
Harold J Burstein, MD, PhD
Lisa A Carey, MD
Rowan T Chlebowski, MD, PhD
Javier Cortes, MD, PhD
Kevin R Fox, MD
Julie R Gralow, MD
Daniel F Hayes, MD
Clifford Hudis, MD
Sara A Hurvitz, MD
Ian E Krop, MD, PhD
Hannah M Linden, MD
John Mackey, MD
Kathy D Miller, MD
Hyman B Muss, MD
Ruth O’Regan, MD
Joyce O’Shaughnessy, MD
Hope S Rugo, MD
Andrew D Seidman, MD
George W Sledge Jr, MD
Ian E Smith, MD
Joseph A Sparano, MD
Sunil Verma, MD, MSEd

ASH13

CONTENT VALIDATION AND DISCLOSURES
Research To Practice (RTP) is committed to providing its participants with high-quality, unbiased and state-of-the-art education. We assess potential conflicts of interest with faculty, planners and managers of activities. Real or apparent conflicts of interest are identified and resolved through a conflict of interest resolution process. In addition, all activity content is reviewed by both a member of the RTP scientific staff and an external, independent physician reviewer for fair balance, scientific objectivity of studies referenced and patient care recommendations.

Beyond the Guidelines 2013

Breast Cancer Investigator Survey | SABCS 2013

Consensus Or Controversy 2013

Consensus or Controversy NHL/CLL

Use T-DM1 + pert off protocol? Use pert as 2nd- or later-line Tx?

Are there situations in which you would use T-DM1 combined with pertuzumab outside of a trial?

If a patient had not received pertuzumab in the first-line setting, would you use it in the second line or beyond? If so, in what situations would you use it?

Initial Tx asym. 60 yo, ER+/HER2+, liver, lung mets? Sym. pt?

What initial first-line systemic therapy would you generally recommend for an asymptomatic 60-year-old patient with ER-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer and documented liver and lung metastases who has received no prior therapy? The same patient but symptomatic?

Initial Tx asym. 60 yo, ER+/HER2+, bone mets? Sym. pt?

What initial first-line systemic therapy, other than bone-directed treatment, would you generally recommend for an asymptomatic 60-year-old patient with ER-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer and several documented bone metastases who has received no prior therapy? The same patient but symptomatic?

1st-line Tx HER2+/ER-neg untreated mBC? 2nd-line Tx HER2+/ER-neg mBC?

What is your usual first-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive, ER-negative metastatic disease who have received no prior therapy?

What is your usual second-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive, ER-negative metastatic disease?

Use T-DM1 + pert off protocol? If not used in 1st line, use pert as 2nd/later-line Tx?

Are there situations in which you would use T-DM1 combined with pertuzumab outside of a trial?

If a patient had not received pertuzumab in the first-line setting, would you use it in the second line or beyond? If so, in what situations would you use it?

Consensus Or Controversy 2013

Consensus or Controversy MM

Initial Tx asym. 60 yo, ER+/HER2+, liver, lung mets? Sym. pt?

What initial first-line systemic therapy would you generally recommend for an asymptomatic 60-year-old patient with ER-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer and documented liver and lung metastases who has received no prior therapy? The same patient but symptomatic?